How to you go from SPLC backing down after '"human rights advocates affiliated with the United Nations" praised Nawaz's work.' to Quilliam being UN affiliated, and SPLC not backing down?
At least read your own link, please. I get what you're saying about the settlement but they could've just paid out and not gone to such lengths explaining how they felt they'd gotten things wrong.
Could they have, or was an apology a part of the settlement? We'll never know - but since it got to the point of a settlement, I'm betting the apology was a requirement of avoiding court.
At least read your own link, please. I get what you're saying about the settlement but they could've just paid out and not gone to such lengths explaining how they felt they'd gotten things wrong.