> 3. Force them to all come together to decrypt the will for fairness.
This seems like a good recipe for ensuring integrity of the will, but it's hard (for me) to see how it ensures, or even promotes, fairness.
(Also, compelling presence seems like a strange side effect: the sort of person who would skip the reading of a will might not be motivated to ensure the fairness or integrity of the will anyway, so requiring their presence to verify it seems counterproductive.)
You could just write your will and sign it with a known public key. I don't see any reason why you'd want to keep the will hidden, or require participation to read it
I thought this was a command!
> 3. Force them to all come together to decrypt the will for fairness.
This seems like a good recipe for ensuring integrity of the will, but it's hard (for me) to see how it ensures, or even promotes, fairness.
(Also, compelling presence seems like a strange side effect: the sort of person who would skip the reading of a will might not be motivated to ensure the fairness or integrity of the will anyway, so requiring their presence to verify it seems counterproductive.)