Rust is a constructive proof that your assertion is simply false. It comes at the cost of some complexity—every Rust type carries thread-safety information with it—but the benefit is that writing correct parallel Rust code becomes very easy.

What you cannot easily do in Rust is dynamically switch thread safety on or off.

How well do you know Rust, and how it works, and what it guarantees?

Like, do you have a specific objection to the way Rust accomplishes this?

"thread safety for all data" is not even a well-defined term, I do not know what you are trying to argue about.

I gave you a definition in my initial reply to you.