> “In this country we’ve had incidents where these UAPs have interfered and actually brought offline our nuclear capabilities,” he said. “We also have data suggesting that in other countries these things have interfered with their nuclear technology and actually turned them on, put them online.”
a) Russia or China or an unknown state has discovered revolutionary/significantly advanced technology that one else has - but why admit this publicly unless you are preparing public for potential conflict or need cash?
b) An unknown state actor (think billionaire James Bond villain type) has invented/discovered revolutionary technology no one has - but why admit this unless you think that by making it public you might gain further information?
c) this is a new phenomenon and they genuinely now think there are other beings visiting this planet - and that due to natural erosion of religion/secularism the population can now deal with this fact - what changed - why now?
d) this is a cover story for new US technology that they don’t want to admit to having developed, or that potentially is so revolutionary they haven’t told the existing military/industrial complex about it and they want to continue to deny it, maybe someone has information they are afraid will leak and want to discredit before it happens?
e) this is a cover story for something completely different that they want to distract from or explain away - interesting how they mention the nuclear Arsenal a lot. Also relates to Adam Curtis’s film - he claims conspiracy theories were invented to control people and ran out of control - perhaps they are worried that conspiracy theories no longer work so want to stoke the fire? Distraction from the toll of Covid? (Covid was invented by aliens?)
f) they have know about this for sometime, it’s genuine and they want to prepare people for an unknown piece of information.
G) what you see is all there is? They genuinely have no idea what’s going on but some firm indications that something is happening and now the prevailing wisdom is that government transparency is best policy?
Either way feels like we are going from film plot to film plot at the moment, two years of outbreak - now close encounters?
As much as I would like to believe first contact is imminent...it's mostly like just private companies or individuals flouting FAA rules while they test/play with custom drones.
State actors wouldn't blow the surprise advantage by testing stealth UAVs in areas where they would be easy to spot (such as within radar/visual range of one of the world's busiest international airports).
Umm... what?