A quick skim of your comments shows that you consider yourself to be better informed than the majority of scientists in several fields. How did you become an expert in so many areas of study, and why are you having so much trouble convincing your peers of the truth?
I prefer track record over appeals to authority. So far I correctly predicted that SARS-2 originated in a lab before it was acceptable to have that view.
My only other outlandish predictions are climate related: that the earth isn't warming, it's cooling, that CO2 isn't a major driver of climate change (vs. water and the sun), and that oil is mostly a renewable resource.
Your account seems to be using HN only to get involved in flamewars about ideologically contentious topics. Can you please not do that? It's not the kind of site we're trying for here.
