Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Look - super impressive but it's not hard to find downsides. This thing took 20 years and near a billion dollars; at some point you should be asking, "Why couldn't we have had it sooner or cheaper or some combination of the two?"

Say it wildly over performs reliability.. it lasts not 20 years but 1,000 years - is that more of success? I'd argue against that - it's more of a failure because we don't need it to last that long.

What if - hypothetically - we had JWST 10 years ago for half the cost but it were just winking out right now? Would that be a failure? I think that's at least an arguable point.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: