Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In terms of security and stability I think FSF view is correct

Although I think they could have a second tier, more relaxed for Debian, NixOS and others, that exclude nonfree software/firmware but allows you to enable it. But in general I think it is commendable that they have been able preserve their values and not dilute and disappear

When I buy my hardware I make sure it is compatible, stable and won't have many issues with Libre Linux, even thing like swapping the wireless card to a compatible one

And this has been the rule also for all Linux users. You want to make sure you have a smooth experience, you will have to check for hardware recommendations. Want fingerprint working? Better be sure before you buy

Regarding security most Libre people are not serving cloud services in their computers, and install only open source. So the microcode security mitigations like, spectre and meltdown, are mostly unnecessary. Also browsers and kernels have been patched for it anyway

When I configure a server I will probably majorally never upgrade it, because it will always cause problems, sometimes small, other times big headaches. I would sooner configure a new one and migrate things slowly

If one microcode update is enough to fix your system is also enough to break it: Intel to disable TSX by default on more CPUs with new microcode https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27664856

This recent security paranoia that you should be updating everything every day or else the hackers will get you! seems unnecessary and potentially harmful



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: