Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Their vision stack now produces depth information that is dramatically superior to that from a forward-facing radar.

RADAR is more low fidelity though, blocky, slow and doesn't do changes in direction or dimension very well. RADAR isn't as good as humans at depth. Only benefit of RADAR is it works well in weather/night and near range as it is slower to bounce back than lasers. I assume the manholes and bridges that confuse RADAR are due to the low fidelty / blocky feedback.

LiDAR is very high fidelity and probably more precise than the pixels. LiDAR is better than humans at depth and at distance. LiDAR isn't as good at weather, neither is computer vision. Great for 30m-200m. Precise depth, dimension, direction and size of object in motion or stationary.

See the image at the top of this page and overview on it. [1]

> High-end LiDAR sensors can identify the details of a few centimeters at more than 100 meters. For example, Waymo's LiDAR system not only detects pedestrians but it can also tell which direction they’re facing. Thus, the autonomous vehicle can accurately predict where the pedestrian will walk. The high-level of accuracy also allows it to see details such as a cyclist waving to let you pass, two football fields away while driving at full speed with incredible accuracy.

[1] https://qtxasset.com/cdn-cgi/image/w=850,h=478,f=auto,fit=cr...

[2] https://www.fierceelectronics.com/components/lidar-vs-radar



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: