You're making the exact argument Twitter made for not banning Trump during the first 3.8 years of his presidency. Like literally "Trump is newsworthy" is word-for-word the reason Twitter used for keeping him on.
Then, they thought that they were, or could be, complicit in a violent domestic attack, and made a call.
They actually were complicit in a failed coup.
They are lucky that nobody had the balls to prosecute the organisers of the coup and only the rubes that actually participated are somewhat paying.
Then, they thought that they were, or could be, complicit in a violent domestic attack, and made a call.