Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What about married couples that decide not to have children ? The truth is it’s hard, and if the community does not support families then you have less children. Think about both parents working full time + and barely having enough to provide from a material standpoint, let along emotional and education.

Point is parenting is hard and life today makes it harder. I don’t believe wedlock is a deciding reason for people having children.



We rearranged our life from DINK to SIWK for this reason.

If I'm paying for childcare the expenses often increase linearly with the number of children, with my wife caring for our children we were able to double the number of children while substantially reducing costs.

We are no longer jetting to Alps for skiing, and we've not had a night out without the kids in 9 years but we've different priorities now.


I think this is a reasonable course of action, of course, but also respect the DINKs who look at having kids and go “no thanks” and continue jetting off to the Alps, Turks and Caicos, or whatever. Having kids is an opportunity cost, and there’s a lot of life enjoyment to be had if you don’t have them.

Kids were previously an asset a century ago, now they’re a luxury good.


Sure r/childfree has lots of this sort. They often seem a bit too into being childfree to me, I probably wouldn't like their shitty kids anyway.

There's an opportunity cost for most life decisions. Sometimes they're obscured. It's often not presented this way but for a cohort of women university and work, displaces marriage and children.


Imo r/childfree to normal people who just don't want to have kids is like r/atheism to normal people who just happen to not be religious. Both subs are absolutely insufferable, even to many of those who align with them on the core premise.

It feels like a lot of users there, instead of replacing all that time/effort/money spending (that comes with having kids) with a bunch of fun/useful/exciting things to do in life, they end up replacing it with "not having kids is my personality and the ultimate activity".

I agree with the core premise of both (not religious, don't want to ever have kids), but i ended up completely filtering out both subreddits. Even opening a random post from those subs on r/all is like stepping into some children- and parent-hating alternate reality cesspool, where their choice is the only "obvious" choice, and everyone else is "brainwashed" or an idiot.


> Imo r/childfree to normal people who just don't want to have kids is like r/atheism to normal people who just happen to not be religious. Both subs are absolutely insufferable, even to many of those who align with them on the core premise.

That's an important point. I'm in the "people that just happen to be not religious" group, some people around me are religious and we have no issues getting along. These subreddits are based on a total rejection of "live and let live".


College-educated women are more likely to marry. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/social-mobility-memos/2016/08...


And yet they don’t date down, so they can’t find partners (as there is not an equal amount of educated, high earning, high status males).

https://theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/nov/10/dating-gap-...

https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-gender-gap-in-marriages-betwe...

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/04/01/business/college-gend...

(“College educated gender gap” are the search keywords for more info on the topic)


This is what anecdotally feels true to people but isn't what the data suggest:

https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2013/article/marriage-and-divor...

Even in the Guardian piece you're linking there:

> To me, looking at the demographic data, it doesn’t seem that there is a widespread aversion to forming serious relationships [across educational lines] – there are more and more relationships in which women have more education than their male partners.”

> She doesn’t see large numbers of educated women holding out for an educated partner, and remaining unhappily single, in other words.

In the Pew piece linked from there,

> The primary reason for the decline in the share of married couples with similar education levels is that marriages between spouses with high school or less than high school education are much less common these days — the share is down from 74% of all marriages in 1960 to 24% in 2012. In addition, adults with high school or less education are much less likely to marry. The marriage rate among this group plummeted —from 72% in 1960 to 46% in 2012.

> Just the opposite has occurred among college graduates. The share of couples in which both spouses have a college degree has risen steadily in recent decades. In 1960, only 3% of couples were in this group, the share rose to 22% in 2012.

Framing a decrease in marriage as "for a cohort of women university and work, displaces marriage and children", what I was responding to, is simply not supported by the data. The decrease in overall marriage is disproportionately due to the non-college-educated. Getting a university degree increases a woman's likelihood of marriage.


Children born from Reddit addicts are the over-socialized version of crack babies.


> They often seem a bit too into being childfree to me, I probably wouldn't like their shitty kids anyway.

You seem a bit too into being childfull, I probably wouldn't like your shitty kids anyway.


I'm not advocating for more people to have kids. I see people everyday that probably shouldn't have.

But if couples want to, it's doesn't have to be the financial catastrophe that many make it out to be.


I am on 100% with you on that, sadly the modern connected world has broken peoples brains.

The pressure of living up to the "mom/dad" in the bio on your social media coupled with the cripplng fear of buying the wrong pram or not enough toys and fucking your child up for life has spawned an industry that is happy to facilitate the drive toward that financial catastrophe.


> Kids were previously an asset a century ago, now they’re a luxury good.

This might apply to individuals but not to nations or society as a whole.

Pensions, healthcare, capitalism, etc are so dependent on new people being born. I would assume that's why the ticking demographic bomb is so worrying for governments with declining birthrates.


That is great. I am glad that you were able to make this change! It was not until we had our own children that I truly understood (or maybe appreciated) when my mom would say "After all I have done for you" OR "Thats why we can never have anything nice"... HAHAH. I love it. totally relate now.

On a serious side note. I think many (including us) highly underestimate how much time children require.


Having come from a large family, I never realized that people didn't understand just how much work kids are. It's relentless. My wife is regularly astonished. I'm lucky to have been able to stop at one. I would have preferred married but childless but I'll take married to her over any other option, so I compromised. At with just one, we aren't spread so thin.


Older kids can help raising the others, I think having just one is where you do the maximum amount of work, also because with the later ones you are more experienced.


You also miss the economies to be had with reuse. Much happier buying many things knowing all four are going to get use.

Everyone gets there own new underwear.

Also after the collapse of civilization, the labor of the children will be especially helpful. :)


I was an only child. My wife has a brother. We felt it was important for our children to have siblings to have the opportunity for sibling relationships in adulthood.


That all depends on the relationship between the siblings. I have 6 siblings and because of life choices we rarely keep in touch. My spouse is in the exact situation.

Why? Is it possible our busy schedules, ability to relocate, and less dependency on each other are reasons why this may not be as important as it was at one time?


Yes, I can see that, also you're not dead yet, you may still reshape those relationships.

Also you may not have experienced the adversity necessary to forment the desire for a fuller sibling relationship.


>Point is parenting is hard and life today makes it harder.

Only if you care about what the influencer of the day is saying. Things are much easier now as we have childcare, kindergartens, disposable diapers, milk formulas, better healthcare.


Childcare, formula, and healthcare are also very expensive and hard for those not making lots of money to pay for in a lot of cases.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: