No, at no point have I been discussing the whole world.
> Or are you dishonestly using non-representative figures?
No, but feel free to correct me if I made a mistake in my calculations.
> The US has a much smaller proportion of the developed world's men, women and children than it does the land
Yes, this is my point. The US has a lot of land per person.
> and those men, women and children are extremely carbon-intensive.
Yes, but that has nothing to do with this conversation.
No, at no point have I been discussing the whole world.
> Or are you dishonestly using non-representative figures?
No, but feel free to correct me if I made a mistake in my calculations.
> The US has a much smaller proportion of the developed world's men, women and children than it does the land
Yes, this is my point. The US has a lot of land per person.
> and those men, women and children are extremely carbon-intensive.
Yes, but that has nothing to do with this conversation.