Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Thanks for taking the time to answer everyone's questions, and for asking me this one.

My own personal preference would be if you could please support PG, because in that case I could be confident of going into production with what I configure, even if it's less scaleable than CockroachDB. I'd really prefer to be learning about how Zitadel works, rather than learning CDB or trying to remember sqlite cli commands.

I'm happy to give CDB a spin once Zitadel 2.0 comes out, but it will add to the burden of onboarding it into my stack, and I'd think that's something you'd like to avoid going forward :)



Well thank you for your time. Let me check with the team. I am certain we can release 2.X with a Postgresql support ;-)

I created an issue for further tracking https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/3598


That rocks. Thank you. I’ve been hanging out for a more lightweight IAM/IDP solution, quite literally for years. I really hope yours is it.


We too ;-)




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: