Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

And, you know, for better or worse, we really rely on plastic for, well, pretty much everything. If we can no longer trust it to do things like safely transport medicine, we’re gonna be in real trouble.


How about good ol' recyclable and washable and sterilizable glasswares?


Sure. These are, 10-100x more expensive per use? Making the medicine available only to top 1% of population sounds like a good deal.


They are also heavier, less robust, more rigid, harder to seal tightly (without plastic), and completely impractical for large-ish items like some food items. Plastic-wrapped bananas are craziness, but a huge lot of our amazing level of food safety depends on plastics, so we can expect getting sick from food a lot more in a post-plastic world, like we used to before the advent of almost-free plastic wrappers.


I don't remember getting sick from food because it was wrapped in paper. And we still don't really know what all the hormone-like substances and microplastics leaching into our food do as a whole.


Here in Europe water costs a couple cents more in a glass bottle than in a plastic bottle. Is packaging really a major cost driver for medicine?


I'd be willing to bet that glass bottle still has some plastic. Like the seal for the top, or the top itself.


But that's still reduces the plastic use to what, 1% of a plastic bottle? 99% savings sounds pretty good to me.


Agreed, but that 1% is very important to the integrity of the bottle. Without it, the bottle might as well be unsealed completely.


If plastic didn't exist, there would be much more demand for glass and in return a much higher price.


10-100x more expensive is still cents. When I lived in a third world country plenty of medications were sold in glass.


What is the CO2 impact of producing glass vs plastic? Of collecting and recycling?

Glass has a lot of good properties but it takes a lot of energy to melt the sand and mold into shape.


Medicine, and food of all kinds, but especially shelf-stable foods, the sort that are really handy after a natural disaster.


First of all, anything that is reasonably dry usually stays reasonably safe against bacteria. Unless the bacteria learns to combine oxygen with the hydrogen from the hydrocarbons to form their source of humidity, I think these should be relatively stable, still.

And we still have the option to store things in metal containers, like cans if we need that extra durability.

But under humid conditions, if bacteria become able to consume plastic the way they can consume organic matter, I would be even more concerned about regular grocery wrapping. Not only could the wrapping break, one could also get half-digested toxic materials into the food itself.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: