Agreed. I enjoy Harris’ take, but it’s narrow and full of tunnel vision, and fails to engage in the slightest bit of charitable coverage. It’s more of a cartoonish depiction of Brand as a one-dimensional villain, rather than a fair appraisal of a human being with all the idiosyncratic fallibilities we’ve come to expect. Surely, he could find at least one good thing to say about Brand? Harris comes off as slightly tone deaf with this piece, as it lacks nuance and attention to historical dynamics.