> I can't follow your argument. You seem to imply at the same time that my numbers are too small and too high. Which one is it?
The devices are too small and the numbers are too high. (These things can be looked up.)
You know, kind of like how if you build a $300k machine out of A100s, and then try to match it with 3090s, you end up spending $800k.
.
> The conventional part of the power plant is listed at $1.4 BN (page 107), which comes at about $640 MM/GW, in line with the estimate from my previous comment.
Sorry, no, your comment was about the turbines, and the document you're linking to is about *the entire plant*.
Please stop trying to google-fight your way through this. You can't learn with your finger in the air.
The devices are too small and the numbers are too high. (These things can be looked up.)
You know, kind of like how if you build a $300k machine out of A100s, and then try to match it with 3090s, you end up spending $800k.
.
> The conventional part of the power plant is listed at $1.4 BN (page 107), which comes at about $640 MM/GW, in line with the estimate from my previous comment.
Sorry, no, your comment was about the turbines, and the document you're linking to is about *the entire plant*.
Please stop trying to google-fight your way through this. You can't learn with your finger in the air.