Errr... yes. We should basically be aiming to take into account a wide range of experiences and perspectives when forming our opinions, and by surrounding himself with a clique of bro-y young men Rogan provides a very narrow perspective on the world, and arguably a big part of the reason he's so popular is because he doesn't really challenge the perspectives of his audience.
We have a wide variety of media outlets to expose experience of different groups. That fulfils what you're looking for. You can find opinions of pretty much any group no matter what.
What your proposal would do, most groups wouldn't get a chance to translate their experiences. Biggest and/or loudest group would dominate the narrative. Everyone else would be tuned out to bigger or smaller degree.
Actually, we already had your solution. Back in TV-dominated era. Only vetted content would make it to the public. With marginal groups silenced. Well, those marginal groups just started tiny podcasts to tell their stories :)
What do you think would happen if you take those tiny podcasts and force them to act like big media of the old days? Can you silence some dude streaming from his kitchen?
