The problem is that I do not have enough disposable income to give $30 to everyone.

The 60k for college is an investment in the future, but more importantly it’s not my money I’m spending, and there’s no replacement for that piece of paper.

Sure there is: evidence of competency. Many people will hire you if you can demonstrate you actually know what you're doing, which a site like Fireship (presumably) can help you to learn.

This fallacy needs to die. It's why many who work in jobs are highly unqualified (they're hired for credentials/connections, not competency).

The problem is; one needs to get to the point in the hiring process where one gets the chance to demonstrate competence. Before that point, all one has going is what's in the job application. Degrees and work experience can be put in there and have a good chance to be acknowledged by whoever does the hiring.

> The problem is; one needs to get to the point in the hiring process where one gets the chance to demonstrate competence.

If you follow the same path as everyone else, yes. A "hack" of sorts I've done for this is to find things to improve at a place you want to work, front-load the cost of improving them via a small demo/report, and then reach out to someone in the company who'd find it valuable and start building a relationship. In a lot of cases, you end up getting plugged in directly and can skip the resume roulette.

There's a ton of wisdom in this quote that I picked up from Derek Sivers via his music teacher, Kimo Williams: "the standard pace is for chumps." There's always a backdoor to get what you want, you just have to be more creative than the other people to find it.

What about backend- reliability-, database-engineering or any other positions, where in order to propose an improvement, one would need knowledge about the companies internal systems, which isn't available from the outside?

At that point, your best bet is to build prototypes/demos of what you're capable of and show data on improvements you achieved for others. The way I'd think about it—regardless of position—is to do the thing that others are not doing (or aren't willing to do).

If everybody is sending a resume through the same channel but you're showing up with a working demo and reaching out directly to people in the company, you stand out. I've gotten gigs by just sending a thank you to people who taught me something indirectly through a blog post or interview.

You have to be human. It's not a process to automate or "game." Just be real with people and you'll be surprised how much easier things get. Very few people do that (especially in a genuine way) and the people who pull the levers know the difference between someone who's authentic and someone who's full of shit.

What an over the top comment.

This is about a subscription for learning. Not a subscription for software. This also has no relation to “tracking”.

I will happily be not using any of his/her resources, even if they are free. Thanks very much.

I paid about 60USD per semester of college, by the way. Where’s your God now?

> Also, people won't bat an eye at paying $40k, $50k, or $60k for 1 year at a university

I'm European, I paid 500 euros per year, and that included laboratories and everything.

> It has more to do with psychological anchoring than any sort of economic rationality.

I really don't understand your argument here. Just because you think it's a fair price doesn't mean it's a good price for me.

FYI I used to spend 40/50$ per hour of algo and ds lessons in the past, or I pay 20$ for french classes and a similar price for chess lessons, all of those over zoom/teams/meets.

I'm not against paying for education, but I don't see the value of a 30$/month membership to do these courses.

> I'm European, I paid 500 euros per year, and that included laboratories and everything.

Your education was heavily subsidized by the state. The government version of $0 (500 euro/yr) cost supported by ad revenue (taxpayers).

I think there are different groups of people for each one of those cases and lumping them all together as programmers is a bit of a generalization. I get your sentiment that the cases conflict, but I don't think it's the same person each time holding that view.

I could see people who are against major corporations being for paying inde groups a premium for less than perfect service, just as people who are against Microsoft and Apple will tolerate less than ideal user conditions in Linux.

What if (Arch) Linux is already the ideal user condition.

Hypothetically, of course.

Oh it is. The other users are just brainwashed /s

Big fan of pop os personally.

> Also, people won't bat an eye at paying $40k, $50k, or $60k for 1 year at a university even though you'd probably learn more programming from doing Fireship's classes then a lot of undergrad CS semesters.

If you go to university to “learn programming” you’re doing it wrong.