Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Fair enough. I hope I was clear that I do think that computer programs can understand. I just don't think that optimizing for solving the Turing test will generally yield a computer program capable of "understanding" or "super intelligence".


A turing test is meant to demonstrate one aspect of understanding/thinking. I mean, what else is a good criteria for understanding?


Whether, and to what extent, a given Turing test session probes understanding depends on what the interrogator chooses to ask. The training of ChatGPT does not contain any explicit bias towards demonstrating an understanding of anything, and it seems that a reasonably determined and detached interrogator should have little difficulty in identifying it on this basis.


I disagree, but I think this is one of the most interesting questions of our time.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: