Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm not sure why people are defending Github on this issue, what if the original repo was a template or something, and your thousands of lines of code is gone because the original template repo removed you as a contributor. If I copy something, I expect where I copied it from to have exactly zero bearing on what happens to my copy. If they have a problem they can serve legal documents, giving everyone time to figure something out with zero data loss.


Guess I’ll be cloning repos locally and then pushing instead of forking.


Apparently this removes you ability to open Pull Requests.


This only applies to private repositories. Do not put templates up as private repositories, and do not use forks when consuming templates. That is not what forks are for.


It's irrelevant what they are for. Reality means that things like this get misused but deleting data without warning is still not ok.


I agree completely.

But at the same time - who doesn't have local copies of anything they care about? What are they thinking!?


You’d be surprised at how many use GirHub as their remote code backup platform. Having private file system backups is a question of culture, and a lot don’t have it.


If no one has a copy of the software, does it really exist?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: