Agreed. This article doesn't try to navigate the nuance around why someone still may actually want to follow a program that sounds like disproven broscience. Whether it's about better understanding your limits, familiarizing yourself with the feel of much heavier weight, or trying to make the most of a very short workout, it often makes a lot of sense to include things that aren't the biological optimal choice.
Jeff Nippard does a much better job a presenting things as a trade-off that you should consider when choosing or designing your program.
WRT making the most of a very short workout time. Jeff recommends (presumably backed by science as that's his MO) for someone to instead do super sets/cycles with non correlated muscle groups.
Eg: Bench, Leg extension, Row, rest 60 seconds -- in a cycle so that by the time you get back to bench you've given the chest/triceps 3-5mins rest.
Jeff Nippard does a much better job a presenting things as a trade-off that you should consider when choosing or designing your program.