With 100% certainty Donald Trump has said more lies/bullshit than ChatGPT (porcentually speaking for all his public statements) and he became President of the US, some said due malice, others from stupidity, and some from both; where does people like him fall under the implied fantasy by this article that humans do better than to make "good guess(es) to pass your sense-making filter"? The social beneffits of people like him are less than speculative and the damages are empirically demostrated.
The nerve of talking about "ghost work" for $2 while publishing a page on the internet, where a giant chunk of the hardware used to mantain and use such network is made with raw materials mined and refined with slave labor, and even the parts where is debatable if it constitutes slave labor are jobs that people would never chose over the content filtering for $2.
The nerve of talking about "ghost work" for $2 while publishing a page on the internet, where a giant chunk of the hardware used to mantain and use such network is made with raw materials mined and refined with slave labor, and even the parts where is debatable if it constitutes slave labor are jobs that people would never chose over the content filtering for $2.