AI will prove to be an excellent mechanism for extracting and retaining tacit (institutional) knowledge. (Think 'Outsourcing to AI')
A lot of institutional verbiage, formalisms, procedures, and machanisms are ~giberish for the general public but meaningful within the domain. Training machines that can informationally interact within that universe of semantics is powerful and something these machines will likely do quite well.
If you have domain knowledge, you should ramp up on your prompting skills. That way, there will be a business case for keeping you around.
I tried ChatGPT multiple times with real technical questions (use of custom code and custom assemblies in SSRS) and I got beautiful answers with code sample and such, but they were all wrong.
I was told to use features that don't exist and as I mentioned that, I was told that's because I use an old version of the software.
But this feature doesn't exist in any version
So I highly doubt that it will be a reliable source of information.
These programs are text generators not AI. They are chinese rooms on steroids without any understanding.
Impressive as long you don't look behind the curtain.
The applications I listed are not assuming anything beyond a text generator that can be trained on a domain's explicit and tacit knowledge. They are not going to "innovate" in the domain, they will automate the domain.
A lot of institutional verbiage, formalisms, procedures, and machanisms are ~giberish for the general public but meaningful within the domain. Training machines that can informationally interact within that universe of semantics is powerful and something these machines will likely do quite well.
If you have domain knowledge, you should ramp up on your prompting skills. That way, there will be a business case for keeping you around.