> the article says its open source definition is "too strict" because it says you must have "no pathway to commercialization"

What a load of crap. Free Software's "0th freedom" is the ability to use the program for whatever purpose you wish. The definition of Open Source is even looser than that. They are asking their "Open Source" users to make their software non-free, by restricting its use cases.

Anyway, the writing has been on the wall for a long while. If you haven't moved off Docker Hub yet, now is the time.