Again, you missed the point. LLaMA is under a non commercial license. I never stated it is illegal, just that a company will not want to violate license terms even if it is legal, simply because getting sued in a civil case is still a risk they wouldn't be willing to take compared to the benefit.
Of course they would apply, if you're using LLaMA at all. If you're using a different model that derives from LLaMA, depending on the license terms, the same license might also apply (similar to how GPL virality works). If you're using a wholly different model, then the model's license applies instead of LLaMA's.
> No, they wouldn't. You clearly don't understand how this works.
Interesting way to continue the conversation, before you edited. I honestly don't understand how you think using LLaMA but denying their license terms is a viable strategy, the courts would just point to the license when Meta sues you for using it commercially. But I'm sure me continuing to explain wouldn't make you understand further.
