> and then on top of all the other things organized a rebellion against the next president's election.
That is not what Trump was indicted for. It's like saying my neighbour should be fined for throwing trash in his yard because he killed his wife. Both things are totally unrelated.
> The reason it was unprecedented was because previous presidents hadn't committed crimes like that
Almost every presidential campaign (including Hillary Clinton's) has done campaign funds misuse. But again, Trump is not being indicted for giving money to Daniels from campain funds (which is totally legal, believe it or not!), he is being indicted for mislabeling it as legal fees.
> But again, Trump is not being indicted for giving money to Daniels from campain funds (which is totally legal, believe it or not!)
Well, it would be legal if properly reported in campaign expenditure diaclosures, but... that kind of defeats the purpose of hush money payments to accurately and publicly disclose the amount, recipient, and purpose.
So, to make hush money from campaign funds work, you have to break the law, too.
That is not what Trump was indicted for. It's like saying my neighbour should be fined for throwing trash in his yard because he killed his wife. Both things are totally unrelated.
> The reason it was unprecedented was because previous presidents hadn't committed crimes like that
Almost every presidential campaign (including Hillary Clinton's) has done campaign funds misuse. But again, Trump is not being indicted for giving money to Daniels from campain funds (which is totally legal, believe it or not!), he is being indicted for mislabeling it as legal fees.