Tailwind is a CSS framework, and some soon-to-be cancelled product from Google that shares (stole) its name isn't going to change that in my mind. Honestly, that name collision seems in poor taste. They couldn't come up with a name that's not already used by a popular open source project?
It's pretty obvious that when you prefix a product name with "Project" that's its not necessarily final. If the experiment is a success, it will indubitably be shipped under a less verbose name that doesn't collide.
I know that nothing will stop HN readers from rewarding yet another repetition of this shallow and repetitive joke. But it seems particulary mis-applied in this instance. This is labs, these are not billed as products in the first place! The headline is "help test early-stage experiments".
Can't wait to put my data into a new Google Product that will totally not get cancelled in 3 months.