Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> how do you explain the increase in the standard of living over the last 100 years?

https://ourworldindata.org/energy-production-consumption

That will catch up to us. It already has, in many parts of the world, and it's not looking like it'll get better soon.

And let's not forget, it's not just people who have paid the price.

> The contemporary rate of extinction of species is estimated at 100 to 1,000 times higher than the background extinction rate, the historically typical rate of extinction (in terms of the natural evolution of the planet); also, the current rate of extinction is 10 to 100 times higher than in any of the previous mass extinctions in the history of Earth.

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_extinction

The ecocide which we've inflicted on the planet for the last 100 years will some day be seen for what it is - an atrocity.

https://www.newyorker.com/cartoon/a16995

All of which is to say nothing about the inequality in how that shareholder wealth is distributed, which is incredibly short-sighted for literally billions of reasons. 8 Americans own more wealth than 4 billion humans. It's perverse beyond comprehension.



You only see the curves go upward. But if you look very detailed, you see that a plateau is coming. A downward trend will follow.

When the going gets tough...

About the inequality : it is really bad, but hundreds years ago, the poor were starving because of lack of food, in stark contrast with landlords and knights and kings.

Today an equal amount of or more, people die from too much food than of too little.

My point is, you need to take a step back and look from a bit more distance to see the real trend. Things are bad now, because we are at a maximum.


> a plateau is coming. A downward trend will follow.

The plateau is not coming fast enough, not even close. Scientists are very clear on this point.

We used all that oil and gas to get more work done, but we're still working more hours per year than those feudal peasants.

> people die from too much food than of too little.

We still have thirteen million hungry children in America. 700 million hungry people worldwide.

It's all very solvable, we just don't. We could end world hunger by eating like, two or three rich [0]. Knights and Kings have nothing on our oligarchs.

These trends of irresponsible emissions and rising inequality won't fix themselves. Not in time. Not without radical action.

[0] - https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/oct/13/e...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: