Legitimate question, but the answer is simple: No.
The cost of CO2 capture largely depends on the concentration of CO2. Transport is relatively cheap. If you capture from the atmosphere, that's the most expensive thing you could possibly do.
That's also why people try all kinds of things to increase CO2 concentration. Like Oxyfuel technology, which basically means you're burning without nitrogen, so what you end up with has a higher CO2 content.
It's also why CCS is hard in industries where by design CO2 concentration in the exhaust is low (Aluminium is one of them), and why most of the existing CCS projects are at facilities that by design have high CO2 concentrations (mainly gas upgraders).
The cost of CO2 capture largely depends on the concentration of CO2. Transport is relatively cheap. If you capture from the atmosphere, that's the most expensive thing you could possibly do. That's also why people try all kinds of things to increase CO2 concentration. Like Oxyfuel technology, which basically means you're burning without nitrogen, so what you end up with has a higher CO2 content.
It's also why CCS is hard in industries where by design CO2 concentration in the exhaust is low (Aluminium is one of them), and why most of the existing CCS projects are at facilities that by design have high CO2 concentrations (mainly gas upgraders).