Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Wasn't there a general consensus from most scientist that methods for CO2 storage or filtering it out of the air are highly flawed, inefficient and not worth pursing when it comes to combat climate change?

Or do I misremember?




The co2 in the article (and apparently 70% nationwide) is being pumped into oil fields to help get the oil out.

It’s only about combatting climate change if you ask the PR department


Last I read there were solid ideas but nothing that realistically outperformed “plant a bunch of trees.”




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: