> You have never trashed your system from virtualenv?

Unless one have done something they shouldn't have done (in particular, using sudo while working with virtualenv), this shouldn't be possible.

Due to limitations of most commonplace system-wide package managers (like, dpkg, rpm or ebuild, not modern stuff like nix) system packages exist to support other system packages. One installs some program, it needs libraries, dependencies get pulled. And then its distro package managers' job to ensure compatibility and deal with multiple version conflicts (not fun).

But if you start or check out some project, common knowledge was that you shouldn't be using on system packages, even if they're available and could work. With some obligatory exceptions like when you're working on a distribution packaging, or developing something meant to be tightly integrated with a particular distro (like a corporate standard stuff).

That is, unless we're talking about some system libraries/drivers needed for CUDA in particular (which is system stuff) rather than virtualenv itself.

> That is, unless we're talking about some system libraries/drivers needed for CUDA in particular (which is system stuff) rather than virtualenv itself.

Sir, this is an ML thread.

Venv interacts with that poorly, though to be fair it could be googles fault. Still it shouldn't be even possible.

I mean, virtualenv is not supposed to interact with that at all. System libraries are systems' package manager responsibility. Doubly so, as - as I get it - all this stuff is directly tied to the kernel driver.

What Python's package manager (pip in virtualenv) should do is build (or download prebuilt binaries) the relevant bindings and that's the extent of it. If others say it works this way with C (that comment about cmake and pkgconfig), then it must work this way with Python too.