Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This HR idea of doing questions abput the past to “know” how good somebody will be in the future, is doomed to fail


Source?

From what I can tell, that is the only good predictor we have. See Tversky's work with the IDF or the available CTA methods for studying expertise, e.g. CDM.


Dr. House: people lie!


Compared to what? Leetcode questions? I'd say an in depth discussion about past projects is the only way to know if someone will be a valuable future member of any team.


Compared to just having a conversation and being a good reader of people. Not everybody can do that, as not everybody is a good programmer, or designer or whatever. No silver bullet, also for recruiters.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: