Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Especially when you consider that it was stopped 3 years ago.


Except it didn’t. My daughter in the US created an account and it didn’t require any family pairing or verification that the adult paired with her was her parent


These are EU laws that only pertain to the EU. US has different laws.


I guess TikTok has different software policies per country


Consider that GDPR has been in effect since 2016, with a grace period until 2018 before the EU started to hand out fines.

It's been 7 years that every company operating in the EU knows about these rules, 3 years ago it was already 4 years into effect. There's no excuse, they broke the law, pay the fine.


It's pretty normal for these things to take a while; most fines (and for that matter most prosecutions) would related to historic offences, not ongoing ones.


[flagged]


You do know that corporations are not people? Right?


Obviously. That doesn't mean its good to drive our companies into the dirt, just because they're not people. People depend on them. People work for these companies. Their significance is perhaps far greater than actually ruining just the lives of one person.


Our companies? TikTok is Chinese... That being said, I do not consider jobs or companies benefits a valid argument when it comes to anti trust and regulations.

But you sure know capitalism, and corporations, abuse the goodwill of hoverents, local and national, and communities. You just want to be ultra edgy for some reason.


> our companies

Oh ho ho ho. Now your comments ITT suddenly make sense.


Your honour, clearly you cannot convict my client since the crime was committed years ago.

/s

You don't work for TikTok by amy chance?


I definitely don't work for TikTok. I don't know the details. But the fine is way too much regardless.


you know how it's not too much? they can afford it.


What a deranged idea, you're implying it's okay to bankrupt a company just for a minor privacy violation.


Oh, I think it is totally ok to bankrupt a company for not following the law.


For any violation at all? If one single McDonalds employee in Dublin breaks the health code, you think all of McDonalds should go bankrupt?

I assume you also support the death penalty for J walking?


If it is a single McD employee, fine said restaurant (which is already the case, but you onow that don't you?). If it is a general issue with a franchise chain (McD is running a franchise, so the company to go bankrupt is most likely a franchise in your example), fine them. And yes, that can lead to bankruptcy, as happened a couple of years ago with a Burger King franchise chain in Munich.

If McD is knowlingly selling carcinogenic burgers world wide and reguses to stop, sure, bankcrupt McD.


I don't know how this could possibly be down-voted, it's spot on.


i think it's deranged that you feel privacy violations are minor in any form. also, this isn't a first offense


Data privacy violations are certainly minor. Until we get that through, our companies are going to suffer. We have far, far, far greater problems in the world than privacy issues of usually meaningless data.


Data privacy is a paramount concern in free democracies. But of course you don't get that.


A privacy violation is never minor.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: