> objective information on the nazis should be widely available and can be a useful tool in preventing the rise of oppressive regimes in the future.
Absolutely.
> Nazi ideals like blood and soil, ideas of state efficiency, their attempt to impose Darwinism ideas on human societies.
Absolutely.
> this idea of misrepresenting history
Not sure what you're referring to.
> painting a one sided view is not wise
Yes, it absolutely is. There's a big difference between "how was Hitler popular?" and "how was Hitler right?" I will always advocate for "one-sided views" of the Nazi party and the Holocaust. There's absolutely no academic value in discussing their merits in light of their trespasses. Happy to teach and discuss how, mechanically, they rose to power.
Absolutely.
> Nazi ideals like blood and soil, ideas of state efficiency, their attempt to impose Darwinism ideas on human societies.
Absolutely.
> this idea of misrepresenting history
Not sure what you're referring to.
> painting a one sided view is not wise
Yes, it absolutely is. There's a big difference between "how was Hitler popular?" and "how was Hitler right?" I will always advocate for "one-sided views" of the Nazi party and the Holocaust. There's absolutely no academic value in discussing their merits in light of their trespasses. Happy to teach and discuss how, mechanically, they rose to power.