Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Is it right to recognize ChatGPT as a scholar? Shouldn't we just treat it like any other software tool?


We absolutely should treat it just like any other software tool.


- software tools are cited (you often will site a paper describing the tool). If a tool generates a value and then later a bug is discovered, it's important that the tool was cited.

- one purpose of a citation is to make a clear distinction which work/words are your own and which are not. Are you making a statement because it's based on past work, your own inference, or the hallucination of a LLM? With ChatGPT it's easy to get confused

- there is also the more general issue of academic integrity. You shouldn't submit other people's/machine's words as your own

Maybe more correctly ChatGPT should be on the authors' list ;)




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: