Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They weren't saying the problem was trivial. They were saying that if you massively reduce the problem to its most trivial form, then its trivial form is doable.


> They weren't saying the problem was trivial.

Neither was I? The proof is trivial - actually doing it is very much not.


How would you prove it in the non-trivial case?


What? Are you trolling?


I've no idea what you're talking about. If you ask a non-content free question I can help.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: