How does this have anything to do with net neutrality?
From what I can see, twitch is a business that benefits from the fact that most internet companies don't actually have to pay for internet connection services relative to their usage.
They're mad that forcing them to pay relative to their usage breaks their business model that relies on being subsidised by other internet usage and users, how does that have anything to do with net neutrality?
If anything wouldn't it be more in line with net neutrality to require that servicss that use more of the internet infrastructure pay for it instead of being subsidised by users of other services/sites?
Someone in Korea who wants the data twitch has, and pays their ISP for access to (among other things, twitch), can no longer access the data twitch has.
If the ISP is acting in the interests of its customers, it would make it as cheap as possible for twitch to send the data that its customers want.
If a business you are dealing with makes money some way other than by charging you for the service they provide, you're not their customer, you're their product.
From what I can see, twitch is a business that benefits from the fact that most internet companies don't actually have to pay for internet connection services relative to their usage.
They're mad that forcing them to pay relative to their usage breaks their business model that relies on being subsidised by other internet usage and users, how does that have anything to do with net neutrality?
If anything wouldn't it be more in line with net neutrality to require that servicss that use more of the internet infrastructure pay for it instead of being subsidised by users of other services/sites?