Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yours is the absolutely dumbest comment I've read all year.


I'm pretty sure Google has multiple levels of redundancy and still failed.


Except you're wrong. The client is a SPOF.


On the other hand, if you you forget the password to all 4 copies, redundancy will fail.

Life is lossy


If a copy is physically protected (probably good to have one that is) then it could potentially be unencrypted. Restic won't let you have unencrypted backups (a reasonable design decision to prevent accidentally unencrypted backups), but Borg will.

I also keep my important passwords written down on a piece of paper in a fire safe. This includes my borg and tarsnap keys.


Encryption is an layer to prevent disclosure in cases where offsite vaulting fails to keep data confidential. Backup passwords can be split amongst trusted individuals (N-person keying) so that no one person can access contents themselves, but there is no point of failure when multiple people with the same part of the password.


No, you haven't demonstrated that redundancy will fail. If all 4 copies had the same password, the password was not redundant, and it is the non-redundant component that failed.


I never said they used the same password. If anything, having 4 different passwords to data you access exceptionally, you’re likely to have a bad time. Do you also store the passwords 4 times in 4 separate places?


It's really just entropy that you're fighting here.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: