> This is not a hyperbole. It's the current state of affairs
I should have been clearer.
The GP claims that calling for the cessation of existence of an apartheid state is considered justified by the world.
He's correct. Most of the world would consider it justified.
But ... most of the world would not consider it justified to call for the cessation of existence of an entire country and, by extension, it's people.
South Africa was the first and the defining apartheid state. People called for the cessation of existence of the state. Anyone calling for the cessation of existence of the South African country would have been considered insane.
Additionally, the argument presented by GP is invalid anyway:
1. Everyone wants an apartheid state to cease existence
2. $COUNTRY is run by an apartheid state.
3. Therefore, everyone is calling for the cessation of existence of $COUNTRY.
It's simply invalid. The presence of assertions #1 and #2 above does not lead to the conclusion #3 above.
I should have been clearer.
The GP claims that calling for the cessation of existence of an apartheid state is considered justified by the world.
He's correct. Most of the world would consider it justified.
But ... most of the world would not consider it justified to call for the cessation of existence of an entire country and, by extension, it's people.
South Africa was the first and the defining apartheid state. People called for the cessation of existence of the state. Anyone calling for the cessation of existence of the South African country would have been considered insane.
Additionally, the argument presented by GP is invalid anyway:
1. Everyone wants an apartheid state to cease existence
2. $COUNTRY is run by an apartheid state.
3. Therefore, everyone is calling for the cessation of existence of $COUNTRY.
It's simply invalid. The presence of assertions #1 and #2 above does not lead to the conclusion #3 above.