> would give the president the authority to ban any app or website both foreign and domestic based
No, it has to be controlled by a foreign adversary country [1].
The broadest power is in 3(a)(ii) on page 10, which lets the President designate an app as a foreign adversary controlled application if it is a significant national security threat following public notice and reporting requirements. But even then, it’s a divestiture order subject to judicial review, not the power to ban.
I guess the "and" on 3(b)(i)-(ii) clears up my concerns of "any" website/app.
(B) a covered company that—
(i) is controlled by a foreign adversary; and
(ii) that is determined by the President to present a significant threat to the
national security of the United States following the issuance of ...
It would give the president the authority to ban any app or website both foreign and domestic based on the wording of the text of the bill.
Can anyone verify if this is true in the text of what was passed?