> and the latest Latin-born emperor of Byzant[]ium was Giust[in]iano in the 7th century.
This is a surreal approach to the names of historical figures. Diocleziano and Giustiniano are not their names in English, the language you're speaking, nor are they the actual names of the people. "Costantine" appears to be a hybrid of the modern Italian name Costantino with the English name Constantine, and analogously for "Costantinople".
> the latest Latin-born emperor of Byzanthium
> The crown of the byzanthine empire
There is no H in Byzantium, the Greek original uses a tau and not a theta, and the modern Italian noun and adjective are bisanzio and bizantino. I really can't figure out where you're getting this spelling.
> and the greek inhabitants of the eastern empire called themselves "Romei"
That isn't Greek; surely they called themselves rhomaioi?
What's up with the Italian imperialism from "epolanski"?
> The emperor Costantine I moved the capital
> and the latest Latin-born emperor of Byzant[]ium was Giust[in]iano in the 7th century.
This is a surreal approach to the names of historical figures. Diocleziano and Giustiniano are not their names in English, the language you're speaking, nor are they the actual names of the people. "Costantine" appears to be a hybrid of the modern Italian name Costantino with the English name Constantine, and analogously for "Costantinople".
> the latest Latin-born emperor of Byzanthium
> The crown of the byzanthine empire
There is no H in Byzantium, the Greek original uses a tau and not a theta, and the modern Italian noun and adjective are bisanzio and bizantino. I really can't figure out where you're getting this spelling.
> and the greek inhabitants of the eastern empire called themselves "Romei"
That isn't Greek; surely they called themselves rhomaioi?
What's up with the Italian imperialism from "epolanski"?