dang, I think perhaps a rule should be added for users to not engage in "guilt by association", e.g. tptacek elsewhere made a comment that they flag posts simply because they're afraid there will be low quality comments in them, rather than discerning. Good idea, bad idea, maybe idea?
It answers your question, which has come up many times before, directly. If you feel otherwise, email [email protected] --- "@dang" (or equivalents) isn't a thing here, even in replies.
dang has that username because it's a rarely used word.
And no, it doesn't answer my question - you seem to make assumptions a lot that people should be able to interpret things exactly how you expect them to; and you have the polar opposite behaviour as well of assuming what others mean when you're potentially wrongly interpreting. It's quite fascinating - and you'll assume I'm just wrong without caring to put effort into seeing if I have a valid point or not that could lead to growth.
