Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> For example no good driver is available for the GTX 1080 which will result in a buggy experience.

If you have a GTX 1080. For everyone else that has moved on from an 8 year old graphics card, they won't run into that particular issue. Hence some people reporting a rock solid experience with Arch Linux.



The age shouldn't be an issue, and it should actually be the opposite. Also, I'm not talking about Arch Linux in this case. For Arch, my issues were with the Network card. But as I said, just hop on the "news" panel on the arch linux website, and you'll see all the tiny manual interventions you have to do. For a "rock solid" UX, I would definitely not use Arch, but probably Mint or Fedora instead.


People don’t usually mix the terms “rock solid” and “UX” like that.

Arch is stable. But I agree that its UX isn’t aimed at non-technical people.

Windows, for example, is a much easier user experience but it’s not any more stable for it.

Generally when one says “rock solid” they mean “stable”


Well guess what, old GPUs are still used a lot. According to steam hardware survey https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/videocard/ The GTX 1060 is more used than any RTX 40XX, and the 1080 is about as used as the 4080.


Well… I’ve got the 1070 and it still has more than enough performance for the games I play.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: