Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Or, I would argue, like if a realtor made more money off of the sale than the person selling the house made.


that is easily true. You buy a house for $500k. A year later, you decide to move. The house's value remains at $500k. Realtor commissions of 6% cost you $30k. You lost $30k on the total transaction, the realtor made $30k (not including the original buy).


Only on HN would I see someone argue that depreciating or stagnant assets are the same thing as a 30% transaction fee. This community is smart enough to be able to tell the difference between a tax on revenue and a tax on profit.

Apple is imposing a tax on revenue that is higher than the revenue that Patreon pulls in from each transaction fee.

There is no equivalent situation in a realtor market. In no world would a realtor sell your house for $500k and then tell you that they deserve a higher cut of the revenue than you do.


Surely the realtor shouldn't work for $0 just because your investment didn't pan out, though?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: