The architecture of explaining how open source applications are architected may need a revamping itself?
What might be useful is an approach of live collections that keep evolving / added to. Maybe some sort of extension of the Journal of Open Source Software [1] where authors focus purely on architectural aspects.
Having a classification (by technology, functionality etc.) would also make it easier to make the most out of this wonderful collection.
What might be useful is an approach of live collections that keep evolving / added to. Maybe some sort of extension of the Journal of Open Source Software [1] where authors focus purely on architectural aspects.
Having a classification (by technology, functionality etc.) would also make it easier to make the most out of this wonderful collection.
[1] https://joss.theoj.org/