The expectations that some users might have are not necessarily what are considered desirable by others, and different approaches do have different advantages and disadvantages than each other. I think that some of the choices made by this project are better than other web browser implementations.
I still think that a publicly viewable version control repository would be a good idea though (there are many advantages to this), even if you do not accept pull requests or other stuff like that. (The version control system does not have to be Git; there are others as well, but it would be good to be well-documented (in my opinion, Fossil has better documentation than Git, anyways).)
I still think that a publicly viewable version control repository would be a good idea though (there are many advantages to this), even if you do not accept pull requests or other stuff like that. (The version control system does not have to be Git; there are others as well, but it would be good to be well-documented (in my opinion, Fossil has better documentation than Git, anyways).)