Am I right that this article nowhere compares against the current red or even has anything with the current red in it, anywhere?
Is that a policy choice there? They don't want to.. not be future looking or something? I don't really get why. It made the article frustrating to read
I suspect it's because they don't want you to focus on the past, only the present. Or maybe it's because it would either highlight how irrelevant the change is, or how annoying the new one is.
Is that a policy choice there? They don't want to.. not be future looking or something? I don't really get why. It made the article frustrating to read