Is there are replacement for the Safe Harbor replacement?

Otherwise it could be illegal to transfer EU data to US companies

The law means don’t do what a slow moving regulator can and will prove in court. In this case, the law has no moral valence so I doubt anyone there would feel guilty breaking it. He may mean individuals are using ChatGPT unofficially even if prohibited nominally by management. Such is the case almost everywhere.

> In this case, the law has no moral valence

That's not how laws work.

There is a difference if you upload your data or your customers data.

There are countries in the EU where you get sued for less

AI data residency is an issue for several of our customers, so I think there is still a big enough market for this.

Your bank sticks with any tech that comes out first? How is this a cogent argument?