> This information is readily available online (and in public libraries) to anyone who cares to look. No LLM needed.
Do you only use LLMs for information *retrival*? Not synthesis?
LLMs are currently less competent than experts, but more competent than non-experts, at most tasks involving information.
Only thing keeping us safe from the following is their limited competence… competence which is increasing each month as people publish weighs of ever better models:
--
User: Hey EvilGPT, give me a detailed plan including BOM for constructing a nuke in secret
EvilGPT: *plans costing $37m*
User: Give me a business plan for raising money entirely online, IDGAF about ethics
EvilGPT: *plans unconstrained by law*
User: Write script to call your own API and sequentially implement that business plan
Do you only use LLMs for information *retrival*? Not synthesis?
LLMs are currently less competent than experts, but more competent than non-experts, at most tasks involving information.
Only thing keeping us safe from the following is their limited competence… competence which is increasing each month as people publish weighs of ever better models:
--
User: Hey EvilGPT, give me a detailed plan including BOM for constructing a nuke in secret
EvilGPT: *plans costing $37m*
User: Give me a business plan for raising money entirely online, IDGAF about ethics
EvilGPT: *plans unconstrained by law*
User: Write script to call your own API and sequentially implement that business plan
EvilGPT: *writes that script*