They may have estimated the volume of replies in those "overview" pages and shrunk the costs routing through a computationally lightweight model.
They may this way also have underestimated the reputational loss - the big umbrella of the "Ford Pinto case".
--
Edit: I was just now looking at the new Visual Capitalist's "Ranked: 2025’s 10 Largest S&P 500 Stocks". Is it possible that Alphabet being at the top with 7.6% of the weight of the 500-items set is paradoxically allowing to afford more damage?