I mean, just to steelman the argument, the "market" hasn't had time to react to what LLMs are good at, so your rebuttal falls flat. I think the original statement is more a prediction than a statement of current affairs.
Also, the author didn't say that "ease of use with LLMs" is the _only_ factor that matters. Julia could have other things wrong with it that prevent it from being adopted.
Also, the author didn't say that "ease of use with LLMs" is the _only_ factor that matters. Julia could have other things wrong with it that prevent it from being adopted.